



Diri wrote:Well said Cheryl... And every post you send makes me more and more convinced that you KNOW what you are talking about... You are very right about the mentality of these "liberals" - shying away from a destiny that the Kurds are on a DEFINITE road to meet one day is NOT gonna help Kurds - we MUST FIGHT! EVEN A MOUSE FIGHTS WHEN IT IS CORNERED - DON'T YOU HAVE ANY HONOUR??? AND YOU ARE NOT ASHAMED TO CALL YOURSELF "KURDI" - Such waste of a GOOD and DECENT name!

Kurdi wrote:i dont respect racism, of anykind any where by anyone.

cheryl wrote:these are kurds, NOT iranians.


hopefully you are not a chauvinist like diri, cheryl, who have identity crises. where in iran (I know you are from iran from how well youre aware) are you from?
PEACE.
oh by the way, Can any of you define the term Chauvinism for me?



Vladimir wrote:Why Kurds aren't Iranian/Persian. An article especially made for the person called "Kurdi"

Vladimir wrote:
The Kurdish people are an Indo-European and non-Arab population that inhabits the transnational region known as Kurdistan, a plateau and mountain area in Southwest Asia including parts of Iraq, Turkey, and Iran and smaller sections of Syria and Armenia. They speak Kurdish, an Indo European language of a similar lineage to that of Persian. They are widely thought to be descended of the Medes. Xenophon the ancient Greek historian recorded the Kurds in the Anabasis as "Khardukhi" a fierce and protective mountain dwelling peoples who attacked his armies in 400 BC. Although many Kurds live in modern-day Middle-Eastern countries, it is worthy to note that they differ from Arabs, Assyrians, Persians, Turks and others, both culturally and ethnically. [1]
Example:
Kurdish men
Iranian men
Kurdish women
Iranian women:
Historians, Kurds and Kurdistan
The Ottoman historians of the incorporation of most of Kurdistan into the Ottoman Empire in the early 16th century; Sharaf Khan, the ruler of Bitlis who wrote a detailed history of all Kurdistan's ruling families towards the end of that century; Evliya Çelebi, the Turkish traveller who spent years in various parts of Kurdistan in the 17th century — all of them used the name Kurd in practically the same way and applied it to the same population. So did Ottoman and Persian administrators, down to the early 1930's, when mentioning Kurds became unacceptable in Turkey. Their Kurds consisted of those tribesmen of eastern Asia Minor and the Zagros, settled as well as nomadic, who were not Turkish, Arabic or Persian-speaking.[3] They included speakers of Kurdish proper as well as Zaza (in the Northwest) or Gurani (in the Southeast, with more isolated pockets throughout present Iraqi Kurdistan), Sunni Muslims as well as Shi`is and the adherents of the various heterodox sects in the region. There was only some ambiguity about the Lur and Bakhtiari, living to the Southeast of the Kurds proper, whom some authors called Kurds and others considered as separate groups. (The same ambiguity still persists in the self-definition of at least some of the Lur today.) It is important to note also whom they appeared not to include among the Kurds: the numerous non-tribal peasants and townsmen living in the same area, who included Muslims as well as Christians, and many of whom spoke Kurdish (or Gurani or Zaza) dialects as their first language.
Kurdish language
In each of the countries in which the Kurds live, moreover, the various Kurdish dialects have during the present century undergone a considerable influence of the official language, most clearly in vocabulary but also to some extent in syntax. Closely related dialects spoken on either side of an inter-state boundary have thus begun drifting apart. [Persian, Arabic, Turkish]...[2]
Persian discrimination
The main problem with Persian culture is its lack of tolerance for diversity. Kurds, Bahai, and Jews, have been suffering greatly because they are different and do not accept the way Persians treat them.[4]
An Iranian view
Another neighbor who had close dealings with the Kurds and wrote a useful study of the early phases of the Kurdish movement was the Iranian general Hassan Arfa, who had personally taken part in the suppression of Kurdish tribal uprisings in the 1920s.[6] Arfa was a loyal servant of the Peacock throne, but as an Azerbaijani he was sensitive to the tensions between ethnic identity and citizenship. He rejected Azerbaijani as well as Kurdish separatism but understood the sentiments behind it and wrote sympathetically on the Kurds at the time that the first modern armed Kurdish nationalist uprising was in progress in Iraq.
“Although the Kurds have always lived under two – or, as at present, three Powers – by their speech, customs and costume, as well as by their own consciousness of being Kurds and thus different from [their non-Kurdish neighbors], they have always formed an entity and for the same reasons they consider themselves now entitled to be counted as a nation even if in the past this conception was alien to them.” [5]
“The Turks say: ‘you are Turks not Kurds; there are no Kurds in Turkey.’
(….) They do not allow that there is any Kurdish question in Turkey.
The Iranians accept the Kurds as such but they say that, as the Kurds belong to a group of the Iranian race they form the Kurdish branch of that race and are therefore part of Iran,
and in any case Iran is a multiracial empire based on history, tradition and a common fealty to the Shahinshah. So for Iranians too, no Kurdish question exists.
The Iraqis say: ‘you are Kurds we are Arabs, but together we are Iraqis. Iraq is a part of the Arab nation, but as you are not Arabs we agree to granting you autonomy on our terms, on condition that you continue to be sort of Iraq, without the right or the power of secession.’”
Celebrated Turkish traveller Evliya Çelebi on Kurdistan and the origins of the Kurds
In official Ottoman parlance, Kurdistan was the name of a province (eyalet), an administrative unit. For Evliya, the term refers primarily to the Kurds as an ethnic category, irrespective of political and administrative boundaries.
"It is a vast territory: from its northern extreme in Erzurum it stretches by Van, Hakkari, Cizre, `Amadiya, Mosul, Shahrazur, Harir and Ardalan to Baghdad, Darna, Dartang and even as far as Basra: seventy day's journeys of rocky Kurdistan. If the six thousand Kurdish tribes and clans in these high mountains would not constitute a firm barrier between Arab Iraq (sic!) and the Ottomans, it would be an easy matter for the Persians to invade Asia Minor (diyar-i Rum). (...) Kurdistan is not as wide as it is long. From Harir and Ardalan on the Persian frontier in the east to Damascus and Aleppo [in the west], its width varies from twenty-five to fifteen day's journeys. In these vast territories live five hundred thousand musket-bearing Shafi`i Muslims. And there are 776 fortresses, all of them intact."
The author whom Evliya quotes most frequently on early Kurdish history is an Armenian historian (or class of historians) whom he names Mighdisî, and who so far cannot be identified.[12] The legends that Evliya attributes to this Mighdisî relate early Kurdish history to two other complexes of legends: the tales of the Prophets (qisas al-anbiyâ), and the Iranian tradition of the Shahname. Evliya's Mighdisî attributes a venerable age to the Kurdish language, explaining it as (one of) the earliest language(s) to be spoken after the Flood:
"According to the chronicler Mighdisî, the first town to be built after Noah's Flood was the town of Judi, followed by the fortresses of Sinjar and Mifariqin.[13] The town of Judi was ruled by Melik Kürdim of the Prophet Noah's community, a man who lived no less than 600 years and who travelled the length and width of Kurdistan. Coming to Mifariqin he liked its climate and settled there, begetting many children and descendants. He invented a language of his own, independent of Hebrew. It is neither Hebrew nor Arabic, Farsi, Dari or Pahlavi; they still call it the language of Kürdim. So the Kurdish language, which was invented in Mifariqin and is now used throughout Kurdistan, owes its name to Melik Kürdim of the community of the Prophet Noah. Because Kurdistan is an endless stony stretch of mountains, there are no less than twelve varieties of Kurdish, differing from one another in pronunciation and vocabulary, so that they often have to use interpreters to understand one another's words."[14]
Notes:
[1] From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
[2] We also find Kurdish tribes mentioned as far away from this region as western Anatolia, eastern and north-eastern Iran, but all of these tribes retained memories of their ancestors migrating there from the said region.
[3] Martin van Bruinessen- Kurdish Nationalism and Competing Ethnic Loyalties
[4]http://www.geocities.com/~ghobad/
[5][6] Source the BOOK Arfa, The Kurds, p. 155 in article:" The Kurdish Movement Seen by the Kurds and by their Neighbors Wadie Jwaideh Memorial Lecture in Arabic and Islamic Studies,
Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures & Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies Program,
Indiana University, Bloomington, 19 November 2004. By Martin van Bruinessen
[7] Martin van Bruinessen, “Kurdistan in the 16th and 17th centuries, as reflected in Evliya Çelebi’s Seyahatname”, The Journal of Kurdish Studies 3 (2000), 1-11.
Off course I don't know much about history, I am a dumb, ignorant, young, poor uneducated Kid. That’s why my paper about the Kurds was labelled “excellent” by the “Netherlands Institute of International Relations, situated in The Hague.” Tell this to your daddy..
Ok.. thanks

Diri wrote:hopefully you are not a chauvinist like diri, cheryl, who have identity crises. where in iran (I know you are from iran from how well youre aware) are you from?
PEACE.
oh by the way, Can any of you define the term Chauvinism for me?
How stupid - do you use a word you don't understand - and this is your wisedom and intelligence?
Let me just tell you that you can eat your words... There is no such thing as Kurdish chauvanism...
Why? Because there are some hinders for us to be chauvanist - like we could NEED a country to BE CHAUVANIST!
How can we - a people who are oppressed by our neighbours and who have been made to accept our fate and destiny as slaves of Arabs, Turks and Persians do anything to them?
We can't impose anything Kurdish one these nations... So ergo we are not chauvanist
- and also for the record - we don't HATE them... I don't hate any of them -
my point exactly.that is a very stupid and ignorant thing to do
- I don't know every single Arab, Turk or Persian - what I DO know is that Kurdistan is at the mercy of wolves and vultures... I hate the REGIMES in TURKEY, IRAN,IRAQ and SYRIA - NOT THE PEOPLE...
I'll explain one thing - I never said that Kurds aren't Iranic...
We are - but the right term is "Arian" - the word Iran has derived from the word Arian... So yes we are Arian... And so are Persians, Afghans etc...
But if you could get your nose out of the clouds I could ask you something - Why did Iran do NOTHING in 1920 when the Ottoman Empire was gonna be split?
If they believe we are Iranian - why the hell didn't they want us to be part of Iran? Could you ask your uncle this? Maybe he could answer why we were rejected even by our Persian "brothers"...
And this forum is meant for Kurdistan... If you are Iranian - go to the Iran forum...Ergo you must THINK of yourself as a Kurd for coming here - or maybe you wanted to make others think like you do? Convert them to IRANIANISM! LOL


Vladimir wrote:It's hard to do discussion with someone who instantly is attacking you on a personal way. I can conclude that you don't know who I am, you don't know how to have a discussion and don't know how to put proof into your arguments without a source.
Off course everyone can shout LIES LIES..
A lot of the material I copied was about the Kurds and their etnicity/history. Including a professor of an university. I think he knows the Kurds better then me, because he is expertised in Islam, Indonesia, Middle-East, etc.. (And also Kurds)
But I don't spent more time with you, because it's useless.. good luck with the so-called Iranian people.. Kurds are just as Iranian, as Dutch people are German. I wonder what Dutch people would say .. if Germans came with this theory..that their culture, habits, language is German[ic]. Then they would say it's true, but we STILL don't live in Germany and we still are another kind of people.
You also think Ahwazi Arabs are Iranian or Azeri??





Return to Kurdistan Debates, Articles and Analysis
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot]