Arashi wrote:oslonor wrote:Arashi wrote:oslonor wrote:So according to you: You are not critical of the regime in Tehran.
Never said that.oslonor wrote:Secondly regime in Tehran monitors everybody related to Iran specially somebody like you that is active on forums. So you have no problem with them. That is fine. But even then supporters of regime in Tehran do not post their pictures because they do not want opponents of the regime know how they look like. So your behaviour looks strange execpt if that is not your picture.
I don't care, really.oslonor wrote:Also you are confusing the issues. There is no Persian state in the area. There is an Azeri Turk regime in Tehran. Of course Kurds will not buy Pan-Iranism from some Azeri Turk regime. And Iraqis are not Arabs. Yes. Kurds are making a very good decision to stay within Iraq.
Kurds would not wish to live in the same country as Persians even if the so called Azari regime was toppled and a Persian government was installed.
Why do you go to such lengths to prove Azaris as Turks, and then say Iraqis aren't Arabs? They sure possess more Arabic traits than Azari do Turkish.
Majority of Iraqis are the anceint people of Mesopotamia. Many of them might have Persian origin.
Azeris originate from Oghuz Turks. That is the difference.
I think you are basing your conclusions after a discussion with Diri. Diri or you do not know even what is Persian. Persians and Kurds have lived in this area since ancient times. They do not need some Azeri Turks tell them what is right or wrong.
And we certainly don't need some Scandinavian educate us on our relation, past, or country. You're a REALLY iffy norwegian...
WOORD!!!
