Mahdi Kakei
The colonial Lausanne Agreement has practically expired and the features of a new political map for the Middle East region have begun to emerge, drawn under the leadership of the United States, France and Britain
The Turkish regime knows the truth about the new political map for the region and has begun desperate attempts to thwart the drawing of this map by resorting to those who are responsible for it and those who influence it as follows:
1. The Turkish regime has begun to court Mr. Abdullah Ocalan and try to convince him to announce the dissolution of the Kurdistan Workers' Party or end the armed struggle in exchange for his release.
The main Turkish goal of this initiative is to end the self-administration in the West Kurdistan Region by the region meeting Ocalan's request to lay down arms and give up the Kurdish national rights of the region. Erdogan is trying to deceive Kurds through Ocalan just as Kemal Ataturk deceived the Kurdish deputy in the Turkish parliament (Hassan Khairi) who used to attend the sessions of the Turkish parliament wearing his Kurdish clothes, and Ataturk convinced him to send a telegram with (Khalid Ziya Beg) to the Lausanne Conference in 1923, declaring the Kurds' insistence on remaining in one state with the Turks.
- After signing the Lausanne Agreement, Ataturk executed Hassan Khairi, and this is what Erdogan wants to repeat with Ocalan and then kill him in some way, for example by poisoning him
The region should also continue to cooperate and coordinate with the international community to achieve the freedom and independence of the people of the Kurdistan Region with its various national, ethnic, religious and sectarian components.
2. To stop a new drawing of the region, the Turkish regime is courting Israel with offers to provide it with various services, for example, protecting Israel's security from the Syrian side, restoring economic relations and security coordination with it, and supporting Israel's annexation of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, the Golan Heights, Mount Hermon, and other areas of Syria. However, the Turkish attempt fails because the Israelis know that their existence as a people and a state and their national security are linked to the establishment of the state of Kurdistan, as the Kurdish people are Israel's only strategic ally in the region.
3. To abort the new Middle East project, the Turkish regime is also working to offer its services to the United States of America, such as cooperation and coordination with it in the Ukraine war with Russia, as well as against the Iranian regime, fighting ISIS terrorists, and taking responsibility for guarding prisons in the Western Kurdistan region where ISIS terrorists are located, as well as preserving American interests and Israeli national security. However, America knows the Turkish-Ottoman ambitions and the terrorist Islamist ideology of the Turkish regime and its support for terrorist Islamic organizations.
- America knows that the establishment of the State of Kurdistan guarantees American interests in the region and with the security of the State of Kurdistan, peace will prevail in the region and its people will be free to build instead of killing, wars and destruction
5. At first, the Western Kurdistan region may enjoy a federal or decentralized system of government for a limited period that may last several years, and then the Western and Southern Kurdistan regions will be unified and this young state will become the nucleus of the Great Kurdistan state.
Therefore, the people of Kurdistan should prepare to welcome the birth of their state, and Kurdish officials should coordinate and cooperate with each other and with their Israeli and Western allies to make the New Middle East project a success and establish the state of Kurdistan.
6. The name (Kurdistan) has nothing to do with racism. The region called (Kurdistan) today has been known as the "Land of the Kurds" for thousands of years, before the emergence of the term nationalism, which is a modern term, as the Sumerians called Kurdistan (Kurda Ki Ku - ur - da ki) [1] which means "Land of Kurda", while (Driver) mentions that the Sumerians called the Land of the Kurds (Kurda) [2].
The name of the Kurds was mentioned in the Assyrian records as (Kurti) or (Kurdi) [3] and the Hittites called them (Kūrti.ti.i) which means (mountainous) [4], and in the Armenian records their name came as "Kordi" [2] and the Romans called them (Cordi) or (Corti) [5]. The first to give the name "Kurdistan" to the homeland of the Kurds was the Seljuk Sultan (Sanjar) in the middle of the sixth century AH (twelfth century AD), i.e. more than 850 years ago [6].
From here it is realized that (Kurdistan) is a historical name that has no connection to racism, as the nationalist thought did not exist in those ancient eras, while the racist terms that we are dealing with were invented on racist nationalist foundations after the emergence of the nationalist thought in the region. It must be said here that the citizens of Kurdistan, with all its national, ethnic, religious and sectarian components, are equal in rights and duties under a secular democratic system.
7. The Kurds who use the term "North and East Syria" instead of (West Kurdistan Region) or (West Kurdistan) or (The West) should be ashamed of themselves and that they do not deserve to be citizens of Kurdistan, as they parrot the term used by the occupiers of Kurdistan and in this way they serve these occupiers. They should understand that by doing so they are canceling (West Kurdistan Region), this precious part of Kurdistan that can never be given up.
Due to the importance of the topic, I ask all dear friends to publish the article on their personal pages and in various groups as well as on websites and various social networks so that the largest possible number of people can view it.
Sources
1. B. Hrozny. Histoire Et Progrés De Déchffrement Des Textes. Archiv Orientalni, Vol. III, No. 1, Prague, 1931, p. 286.
2. Driver, G. R. The Name Kurd and Its Philological Connexions. JRAS: 401, 1923, pp. 393 – 403.
3. Dr. Jamal Rashid Ahmed. The emergence of the Kurds in history - a comprehensive study of the background and cradle of the Kurdish nation. Part Two, Second Edition, 2005, page 28.
4. Ibid, page 33.
5. Ibid, footnote page 37.
6. Lee Strange (1930). Lands in the East in the Age of Disagreements.








