jjmuneer wrote:Ofcourse central Asian indo-Iranian R1a1a isn't the same as central, eastern european one. Just look at these two maps. The map isn't meant to be accurate, just a general idea.
I showed you this before: It shows that R1a1a has two types Eurasian and European type, both none the less related to the Indo-europeans.
This is the haplogroups map:
BMAC dates max to 2300 BCE and Andronovo only max. 2100 BCE, while European R1a and Central Asian R1a separated many millennia before that. So European R1a has nothing to do with the so called ''Aryan" DNA.
So Andronovo got Aryanised by BMAC!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMAC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andronovo_culture
jjmuneer wrote:Well in your posts it seemed like you were trying to suggest Kurds were the master race(proto-aryans). You were also saying how indo-europeans came from Kurdistan, trying to suggest that Europeans come from us. That is just me. You should know because you live in Europe if you say your Aryan you'd get laughed at, just forget this whole Aryan BS. Were Iranic, that is it.
Huh? No, Europeans are just native to Europe. And Kurds are native to Kurdistan. They just got a language from West Asia, but their DNA didn’t changed that much.
Nobody is laughing at me when talking about my heritage and they do agree with me in real life.
