Piling wrote:PROFESSORS ( unless you yourself is a professor of course) are calling his books some of the most well written books on the fields of Middle Eastern history and anthropology.
pleaaase I pray you : just ONE quote of these professors saying a such thing. I am greedy to read that.
In fact i don't try to convince you, just to laugh a bit. Convincing an apocî is useless and hopeless. You can't convince a Catholic that Pope is wrong in or a Shiite that Ali was not chosen by Muhammad, etc. Apoism is not a politic ideology, it is a religion. His followers want to believe, nothing else.
I will spare you from a public embarassment. Read the reviews and see what they are saying. If you still do not believe ( or want to believe) that the reviews are highly positive words from world known professors on Ocalan's books... I might consider publicly embarissing you. But I would not enjoy it.
Actually the anti-Apocis are the silly ones. You might consider them to be radical Atheists who are ready to disgrace anything that has to do with Ocalan. If Ocalan gets recognition; '' No, that can not be true. It is a lie and an exaggaration''. When people realise Ocalan is the only solution to the Kurdish question: '' No, that can not be true, there are other important people''. When Ocalan writes unique ideas; '' No, that is a lie, many other before Ocalan has written about it''. Do you see what it is looking like? Total ignoration of the reality as I have stated before.
